Tuesday, February 25, 2020

Lupine Publishers | Hypertrophic Cardiomiopathy in Children: The Need of Heart Transplantation


Lupine Publishers | Journal of Cardiology & Clinical Research


 Abstract


Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common cardiac disease affecting the cardiac muscle. It can manifest in different forms with or without left ventricular outflow obstruction, with or without right ventricle involvement. Forms with biventricular hypertrophy seem to have poor prognosis. In our case, we describe a young patient with sarcomeric biventricular hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (MYH7 mutation), the poor prognosis of this form and strategies options adopted after failure of medical treatment. It is not always easy the management of hypertrophic cardiomiopathy, after medical treatment failure, especially in children. In some cases, heart transplantation is the only one therapeutic option.
Keywords: Hypertrophic Cardiomiopathy; Right Ventricular Hypertrophy; Heart Transplantation

Introduction


Hypertrophic cardiomiopathy (HCM) is the most common cardiac disease affecting the cardiac muscle and is characterized by heterogeneous genetic, morphological, functional, and clinical features. It is also one of the main causes of sudden cardiac death (SDC) in the young. Left ventricular hypertrophy with left ventricular outflow obstruction (LVOTO) is the most characteristic feature of HCM. There are also variant of HCM without LVOTO, with apical hypertrophy, with medio-ventricular obstruction and with right ventricular hypertrophy. The treatment and the prognosis of HCM seem to be variable on the basis of different forms, the age at presentation, sarcomeric gene mutations or rare phenocopies. Heart transplantation (HT) is the only therapeutic option for selected patients with HCM and refractory heart failure. In effect ESC guidelines recommend heart transplantation in eligible patients who have an LVEF < 50% and NYHA functional Class III–IV symptoms despite optimal medical therapy or intractable ventricular arrhythmia (II a); in eligible patients with normal LVEF (50%) and severe drug refractory symptoms (NYHA functional Class III–IV) caused by diastolic dysfunction (II b)[1].
Right ventricular hypertrophy (SRVH) is a relatively rare subtype of HCM. The anatomic, genetic, clinical, and prognostic characteristics of patients with SRVH and the clinical relevance of these characteristics have not been described widely in the literature [2,3]. MYBPC3 gene mutations have previously been described in two patients with RV hypertrophy. In a recent study, 90% of HCM patients with SRVH were found to possess relevant sarcomere protein mutations and variations in the MYH7 (Myosin heavy chain 7) and TTN genes, followed by variations in MYBPC3. Always in this study 73% of HCM patients with SRVH and multiple sarcomere gene mutations had poor prognosis. 7 In addiction MYH7 mutations can cause hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or skeletal myopathies with or without cardiac involvement, on the basis of the side of mutation. In our case, we describe the poor prognosis and treatment strategies of a young patient with biventricular hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and MYH7 mutation.

Case Report


A 12-year-old young woman with familiarity for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (mother and mother’s twin with biventricular hypertrophic cardiomiopathy and MYH7 mutation) was hospitalized in our hospital for dyspnea after mild-moderate efforts and reduced functional capacity (NYHA Class II). Mother and aunt of the patient were asymptomatic with good functional capacity. Patient had the same genetic mutation of mother and aunt (p.Asn696Ser heterozygosis MYH7) but with increased and poor phenotypic expression [4]. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance were performed showing a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with right ventricular involvement. Precisely, cardiovascular imaging showed left ventricle asymmetric hypertrophy especially at the level of anterior and inferior wall (basal and mild anterior wall =14 mm, z score= 3,5; antero-lateral basal wall = 12 mm, z score 2,78; mild inferior wall = 14 mm and apical inferior wall = 12 mm) with normal ejection fraction (FE = 62% at CMR) and moderate diastolic dysfunction (panel B and D). In addiction wall thickness of right ventricle outflow and basal-mild free wall were increased (= 13 mm) with apical obstruction and development of maximum gradient of 10 mmHg (PANEL A and C) [5,6] (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Lupinepublishers-openaccess-cardiology
The function of right ventricle was at inferior limits (FE = 51% at CMR, TAPSE = 16 mm at echocardiography). Thus the patient had an interesting right ventricle involvement and moderate diastolic dysfunction of left ventricle. She had not arrhythmia at ECG-Holter but she had reduced functional capacity. also demonstrated at stress test. Stress test was suspended at 6 min (Bruce Protocol) after pre-syncopal symptoms: lack of adaptation of the blood pressure to the effort was observed. In addition, from several months she had pre-syncopal episodes at the peak of the effort. ECG showed left ventricular hypertrophy and biatrial enlargement. Pro BNP was increased = 5841 pg/ml. Considering clinical situation, we decided to start medical treatment with betablockers (bisoprolol) but the patient didn’t tolerate medical treatment. Thus, we decided to start low dose of captopril without improvement of symptomatology. Also, treatment with diuretic was not tolerate by patient [7,8]. Therefore, considering symptom refractory to medical therapy, the poor prognosis and the impossibility to optimize medical treatment, we decided to plan cardiac transplantation, the only option possible at this moment.
Thus right catheterization was performed and patient was inserted in heart transplantation list. ICD implantation was not considered in the absence of ventricular arrhythmia and other factors. Discussion: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with MYH7 mutation and right ventricle involvement seems to have poor prognosis, especially if right ventricle hypertrophy is severe [9]. In effect the young patient had a greater right ventricular hypertrophy compared than mother and aunt. In these cases, after medical treatment failure, heart transplantation seems to be the only strategy to improve symptomatology and quality of the life of the patient. Especially in pediatric population, it is not always easy the management of hypertrophic cardiomiopathy after medical treatment failure and heart transplantation seems to be the only one therapeutic option. Other study are needed to study some variants of HCM with right ventricle hypertrophy, their treatment and prognosis.

https://lupinepublishers.com/cardiology-journal/pdf/ACR.MS.ID.000130.pdf
https://lupinepublishers.com/cardiology-journal/abstracts/hypertrophic-cardiomiopathy-in-children-the-need-of-heart-transplantation.ID.000130.php

For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website 

For more Journal of Cardiology & Clinical Research Please Click Here: 

 
Follow on Twitter   :  https://twitter.com/lupine_online 

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

Lupine Publishers | Non-Compacted Cardiomyopathy: Is there a Need of a New Cardiomyopathy?

Lupine Publishers | Journal of Cardiology & Clinical Research

 

Abstract

Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) is a myocardial disorder, classically defined as a double-layered myocardium, consisting of a thick, spongy/hypertrabeculated, non-compacted endocardial segment and a thin, compacted, epicardial portion. The American Heart Association (AHA) classifies LVNC as a distinct primary genetic cardiomyopathy, while the European Association of Cardiology (ESC) as an unclassified cardiomyopathy. Despite the magnitude of the entire literature yield on this topic, to date the pathogenesis, prognosis, and treatment are still unclear. Prevalence and mortality can range respectively from 0.05% to 0.26% and 5% to 47%, but they are affected by the imaging criteria adopted for the diagnosis. In fact, LVNC has been for years incidentally discovered during autopsy of unexplained sudden cardiac deaths. Conversely, with the advent of increasingly sophisticated cardiac imaging techniques, the presence of hypertrabeculated myocardium has become very common. Both echocardiographic and magnetic resonance criteria have been proven to overestimate the diagnosis, which shares a peculiar phenotype with other pathologies. It is known that a hypertrabeculated left ventricle leads to a symptomatic triad consisting of heart failure, arrhythmias and thromboembolisms. Therefore, it is current opinion of the authors that a “non-compaction cardiomyopathy” (NC-CMP) seems to be the most comprehensive definition of a disease that, similarly to the other cardiomyopathies, and regardless of its etiology, beyond a peculiar phenotype shares a distinct symptomatology and deserves to be listed as an entity between cardiomyopathies.
Keywords: Left Ventricle Non-Compaction; Non-Compacted Cardiomyopathy; Cardiomyopathies; Heart Failure; Sudden Cardiac Death
Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) is a myocardial disorder, classically defined as a double-layered myocardium, consisting of a thick and spongy or hypertrabeculated endocardial segment, defined as non-compacted, and a thin and compacted portion, laying epicardially [1]. The above-mentioned hyper trabeculations (HXTs) characteristically involve the left ventricle (LV), especially the apex, the lateral, infero-lateral and inferior wall [1,2], and less frequently the right ventricle [3]. Since its first reports, LVNC has always been considered a controversial pathology (Figures 1 & 2). In facts Grant and colleagues, for long accredited as discoverers in 1926, presented a case of persistent sinusoids instead of LVNC [1]. In addition, a lack of uniqueness among the World Health Organization [4], the European Society of Cardiology [5]. and the American Heart Association [6] for its classification, and the presence of trabeculae as a terminal phenotype of LV hemodynamic overload or other myocardial affections, has led several authors to debate on the real existence of a true form of uncomplicated primitive non-compacted cardiomyopathy [7,8].
Figure 1: Two different anatomo-pathological macroscopic sections of the left ventricle, presenting a non-compacted myocardium. Modified from Lorca et al. Int J Cardiol 2016.

Lupinepublishers-openaccess-cardiology
Figure 2: Echocardiographic features of a young adult of 16-years old, admitted in emergency room with acute signs and symptoms of acute heart failure.

Lupinepublishers-openaccess-cardiology
The primitive hypothesis concerning LVNC is that the presence of HTXs is due to a failure in myocardial morphogenesis, in which the immature, non-compacted fetal myocardium normally undergoes a physiological compaction process during ontogenesis [1]. LVNC may occur isolated, in familial forms or associated with several congenital, genetic, neuromuscular and chromosomal conditions [9]. Mutations in the sarcomere gene, particular in MYH7, are the most common and non- sarcomere gene mutations (such as TAZ and NOTCH1) have also reported [10-12]. Some LVNC individuals have been detected by tracking asymptomatic relatives of affected patients [9], and therefore, a close correlation between genotype and phenotype has been recently underlined by 2 recent studies using NEXT-generation sequencing [13,14]. All these pathogenic variants were independent risk factors for cardiovascular events [13]. In addition, mutations in hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide channel 4 (HCN4) have also been reported in families with sinus node dysfunction and LVNC [15,16].
Since only few studies focused on LVNC incidence, both prevalence and mortality are challenging to assess [1]. Among adults, it can be diagnosed in 0.05% - 0.26% of the cases, and approximately 0.14% of pediatric patient, with an overall mortality ranging from 5% to 47% in both populations [1]. Unfortunately, all the reports are affected by the diagnostic criteria adopted, imaging or autopsies, overestimating or underestimating the real prevalence [1,17] .In addition, and similarly with others cardiomyopathies, LVNC can be a subtle disease [17]; if not promptly diagnosed, patients may be asymptomatic for a long time and the onset may range from the early life to the adulthood [8].
The advent of increasingly sophisticated cardiac imaging techniques set the spotlight on HXTs as a very common finding, instead of the rare disease that was previously considered [2,18,19]. Accordingly, Jenni, Chin and Stollberg defined different echocardiographic criteria, while Petersen, Jacquier, Captur and Stacey defined some cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) criteria. 1 Unfortunately, they both showed very poor specificity [7,8], even if CMR overcame the ultrasound-related limits in morphologic assessment, and demonstrated a thigh correlation between late gadolinium enhancement myocardial fibrosis and clinical severity of the disease [20]. Nevertheless, there still a lack of an imaging-driven diagnostic gold standard [1,9].
Clinical findings are variable, including several grades of diastolic and systolic dysfunction, heart failure (HF), thromboembolic events, and malignant arrhythmias. 1 However, the most severe outcome is the sudden cardiac death. Atrial fibrillation, right/left bundle branch block, and repolarization abnormalities may be the only electrocardiographic features present at the moment of the diagnosis [2,8]. There is no specific therapy and LVNC management depends on the clinical manifestations; anticoagulation is indicated only if atrial fibrillation, heart failure, previous embolism, or intracardiac thrombus formation are present [1,21].
LVNC has always been a controversial disease, with some unresolved issues. First of all, there is a heterogeneous genetic background and a wide spectrum of associated conditions that may occur contextually with HTXs. Secondly, LVNC real prevalence is still unknown. Certainly, the lack of any echocardiographic or CMR diagnostic gold standard, with frequent overestimation/ underestimation, does not help to clarify all the uncertainties. In addition, there are a wide variety of overlapping conditions that may occur with secondary myocardial HXTs, for example, a dilated cardiomyopathy or the end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Figure 3). On the other hand, it is common experience that not all the above-mentioned cardiomyopathies and conditions can present an end-stage non-compacted phenotype and generalizing this aspect would be very simplistic. 8 In addition, Lorca and colleagues recently reiterated that non-compacted forms of cardiomyopathy do exist, especially during early stages of life, and they can be demonstrated in some forms of unexplained sudden deaths. 17 Furthermore, a multicenter longitudinal prospective study [7], despite its conclusions, and if carefully read between the lines, suggests that a significant proportion of asymptomatic patients meets all currently used imaging diagnostic criteria for LVNC.
Figure 3: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) exams of patients matching the currently imaging criteria for CMR (A, B, C, 2-chambers view; a, b, c, 4chambers view). (A, a) A 23-years-old male patients with a dilated cardiomyopathy. (B, b) a 38-years old woman with an end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. (C, c) a 45-years old woman admitted in emergency room for acute heart failure, and history of silent cerebral infarcts.

Lupinepublishers-openaccess-cardiology
However, they demonstrated that outcomes are increased by symptoms and clinical conditions when associated with a noncompacted phenotype. Indeed, a recently published multicenter register provided an accurate estimation of genetic-phenotype association, and clinical and events of LVNC patients, concluding that the clinical course of symptomatic LVNC patient with a genotype-phenotype matching can be severe [13,14]. Given all these premises, it is reasonable considering the existence of a primitive non-compacted disease, congenital, and a mild form, with a late-onset, and/or acquired conditions. HF, thromboembolic events, and malignant arrhythmias seem to constitute the clinical triad for LVNC patients, and sudden cardiac death the most severe outcome. There is a tight genotype-phenotype correlation, with a wide spectrum of genes and mutation involved, as well as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, for example, and the current imaging-derived diagnostic criteria probably need to be revised; perhaps it should be worth to combine some imaging and clinical criteria. At last, multicentric registries should be considered to help the real prevalence assessment of non-compacted forms of cardiomyopathies.



For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website 

For more Journal of Cardiology & Clinical Research Please Click Here: 

 
Follow on Twitter   :  https://twitter.com/lupine_online 

Interruption of the Aortic Arch in the Adult and Fulminant Myocarditis: A Strange Presentation

Introduction   53 years old female patient, who presented oppressive precordial pain, radiating to the neck and jaw, for which she went to...